One of the key metrics to look for in these tests is Time To First Byte (TTFB), which is to say how long it takes for the server where your website is hosted to respond when a visitor tries to load your website. It’s also free, so don’t hesitate to use it on your website anytime you want. This is a fast and easy way to obtain a complex rundown of your website’s performance for both mobile and desktop versions. For a better perspective on what’s going on behind the scenes, the sites were also put through Google’s PageSpeed Insights. Just to give you an idea of how other major hosting providers are doing in this area, ’s score was a bit worse than what we got for Hostinger while DreamHost’s results were similar to those of main rival Bluehost. Without getting into a lot of details early on, this can be an indication of the difference between Bluehost’s and Hostinger’s server infrastructure. This is an excellent result for a cheap shared hosting plan and it definitely makes Hostinger the winner when it comes to desktop performance. Our test website managed to fully load in exactly one second. On the other hand, Hostinger’s performance inspires confidence early on.
GTMetrix speed test run on our Hostinger hosted website So, how did Bluehost and Hostinger do? Let’s find out. GQ Magazine almost doubled its visitor count, while increasing median time spent on its website by over 30% when it lowered its page loading times to under 2 seconds. The reason we care about this key metric is because of its association with improved engagement and conversion among visitors. It sounds simple, but there’s a lot going on in the background. The timer starts the moment someone makes a request for your website or clicks a link to it and it stops when the page is completely loaded.
#Bluehost canary mail download
This is how long it takes to download the entire content of a web page on your visitors’ device. Read on for the results or jump over to this article to first learn more about our step-by-step testing and reviewing process.
#Bluehost canary mail free
The only way it gets more basic than this is free hosting, which is something you may want to consider in certain situations.Īs for the website itself, we used a super-simple WordPress site with a couple of pages and the most common functionalities you can think of, like a search bar. We’re talking entry-level, basic hosting.
Bluehost in this department, I signed up for the cheapest shared plan with both. You don’t want to lose your hard-earned spot at the top of search engine results pages (SERPs), nor do you want to deprive your website of standing out, because something’s not right with the servers. This is where web host performance comes in. How about your website being completely unreachable because of an outage or improperly configured security protocols? Speed Matters, A Lotīeyond a certain point, if the server that hosts your website can’t serve your visitors fast enough, there is nothing you can do to improve loading speeds. Or maybe they do, marketing is all over the place today. Well, you could get rid of all the content, but then nobody would want to stare at a blank page. The problem is that there’s only so much you can do to improve the performance of your site. This is to say that, if your page is slow and has no mobile version, it will be ranked lower than your competitor’s. Google Search, for instance, considers page loading speed and mobile-friendliness to be crucial factors for ranking results. It’s not that all the web developers in the world gathered in a room and decided on this (although that’d be funny), but rather than mobile devices and a fast-paced lifestyle have led to significant changes in our expectations.Īnd so, search engines have adapted their algorithms to cater to our behavior. Now, any website that takes more than 3 seconds to load is unacceptable. In the early days of the Internet, when broadband was still a luxury, 8 seconds was considered a fast page loading time. Performance is what everyone really cares about, so let’s tackle it head on. To settle the Hostinger vs Bluehost dispute, I hosted a test website with both for a period of several months. At the same time, Bluehost proved to be more beginner-friendly, not to mention the fact that it’s one of the few managed WordPress hosting services officially recommended by the WordPress foundation. If you want to build a really simple site with just a couple of pages, Hostinger might be a better deal. In what follows, I take a closer look at the most important aspects of Hostinger’s and Bluehost’s services, including performance, pricing, features, security, and customer support.